Capitol Project

PAC partnered with Lancaster History, Ralph Appelbaum Associates, and Civic Architects on the Thaddeus Stevens and Lydia Hamilton Smith Center for History and Democracy, leading inclusive design and accessibility from concept design through construction across a site that mixed new construction with a historic building not easily made accessible after the fact.
Media











Project Description
Lancaster History operates the Thaddeus Stevens and Lydia Hamilton Smith Center for History and Democracy, a museum and education center built around the preserved home, tavern, and law office once shared by Congressman Thaddeus Stevens and Lydia Hamilton Smith, a Black businesswoman and his longtime business and household partner. The site carries deep historical weight of its own: its cellar cistern is documented on the National Park Service’s Underground Railroad Network to Freedom.
Lancaster History assembled a project team that included exhibit designer Ralph Appelbaum Associates (RAA), architecture firm Civic Architects, and community engagement partner Ros Group, and engaged PAC from the earliest concept work through construction to lead inclusive design and accessibility across the architecture, exhibits, and media. PAC was happy to help Lancaster History author and receive an IMLS Museums Empowered grant to fund 100% of PAC’s fees and costs during the entire engagement.
Inclusive Design and Historic Sites
The Center’s spaces split into two very different design challenges: new construction that could be shaped around inclusive design from a blank page, and the historic building’s original rooms, thresholds, and stairs, which were far less forgiving of change. PAC’s role was to develop solutions that worked across both. Through design build reviews at every major design milestone, including schematic design, design development, final design, and construction documents, PAC worked alongside RAA and Civic Architects to resolve wayfinding and pathing through a building that mixed new and historic circulation, furniture design that met varied reach and seating needs without disrupting the historic rooms, and lighting and edge detection that let low vision and blind visitors move safely through spaces that could not simply be regraded or rebuilt. PAC also led charrettes with the project’s collaborators, working through these harder, historic-site-specific problems together rather than in review comments alone. That same collaboration extended to the Center’s largely two-dimensional collection of speeches, letters, and documents, material that isn’t easily taken in at a glance by visitors. The resulting solutions include a Braille introduction and tactile map at the start of each gallery, orienting visitors to the space and its contents before they enter, and touch objects incorporated throughout the experience, giving visitors something physical to connect to a collection that is otherwise almost entirely paper.
Inclusive Design Standards
As the design team moved from concept into architecture and exhibition design, PAC authored a dedicated Inclusive Design Standards reference document for the Center, giving the project’s many collaborators a shared, evolving foundation to design from. The standards covered the campus and building architecture, circulation routes and signage, tactile vocabulary, the design of the built program and exhibitions, exhibit audio and acoustics, graphic design contrast and typography, and both static and time-based media. PAC visited the historic site directly to ground its recommendations in the building’s real thresholds, sightlines, and constraints, and treated the document as a living one, meant to be revisited and updated as the project’s plans solidified through each design phase.
Media Accessibility
PAC also completed a comprehensive review of every planned media component in the museum, including its orientation film, immersive audiovisual programs, soundscapes, interactive maps, and donor recognition video. Each was assessed individually for the affordances it would need, among them captions, American Sign Language interpretation, audio description, and transcripts, grounded in the distinction between multisensory design, which simply engages multiple senses, and multimodal design, which redundantly maps the same information across senses so no one modality is required to understand it. The review also flagged production concerns specific to a historic, immersive site, including pacing and camera movement for large-scale projected media, and sightline and legibility conflicts created by the building’s bench and bar seating.
Concluding Thoughts
What visitors encounter at the Thaddeus Stevens and Lydia Hamilton Smith Center for History and Democracy, from tactile maps at each gallery’s threshold to a building whose pathways were reworked stair by stair, is what becomes possible when inclusive design is treated as a foundational commitment rather than a final pass before opening. Solutions like these have to fit into rooms built decades before anyone considered them, which only works when access is developed alongside the rest of the design, not after it. PAC’s Inclusive Design Standards for the Center call for the document’s recommendations to be revisited roughly once a year following the museum’s opening, and that’s intentional. A historic site’s work toward inclusion doesn’t end at a ribbon-cutting. It continues as the building is lived in, tested by real visitors, and the collection grows.